Skip to main content

Policies in Bhutan

For the last two days (13-14th March, 2012) I was attending a workshop in Paro. It was yet another workshop on policy and adaptation issues. The title of the workshop was "Legal and Policy Tools to Adapt Biodiversity Management to Climate Change". The workshop was beyond doubt very informative and interesting. I have learnt many new things and understood various adaptation issues that countries across the globe is adopting to combat "climate change".
I was surprised by the number of "acts", "rules", "policies" that exists in our country. Bhutan is indeed bestowed with great natural habitat and forest cover, handed over by our ancestors who strived very hard to leave behind the environment in the way they were handed by their fore fathers. The conservation this far surprisingly came without the existence of any rules/acts/laws. The conservation came with the existence of total anarchy. I think Dzongsar Jamyang Khentse rightly pointed that "best way of living is anarchism".
It is really hard to believe the number of laws/rules/policies that exist in our country, but are rarely followed. What is bothering me too much is the framing of laws which are never bothered to implement or follow. What is the use of framing policies when there are always some people above the law?
With the existence of countless number of laws/acts/policies, there are same number of contradiction between various laws, giving birth to conflicts between laws which ironically are supposed to reduce same.
If i could try to list some examples of failure of rules/acts:
1. Sometime in 2006 or 07, Thimphu City Corporation started to employ quite a good number of environmental inspector with the task to impose fines to those people who litters the area.It all started with great pomp and show initially but with time it has finally vanished as i expected when it all started.
2. Another classic example is "visioning Bhutan free of plastics". Plastics in Bhutan was officially banned sometime in 1999, but if you look around even after more than a decade, we can see people freely using plastics carry their shopping goods.

In short I am saying that, when there are time and resources to frame policies, we should also have time and guts/strength to implement it. Bhutan has so many good policies and rules but we just lack implementation. Bhutan receives appreciation for policies and laws, let us strive to receive same for implementation.

Palden Drukpa.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bhutan's Mega Farm AKA Slaughter House

I am a vegetarian and I love animals. Unless all Bhutanese go vegan, I am for the establishment of slaughter house for Bhutan has to become meat self sufficient.  The issue on establishing a mega farm AKA slaughter house is again tabled for discussion in the National Assembly when the opposition questioned the government citing the sentiments of Bhutanese at large. I felt that having understood the economic un-stability of the country by our so called policy makers, such initiatives should not be questioned at-all let alone opposing it. I am for the establishment of mega farm with following reasons: 1. Establishing a mega farm mean meat self sufficient - Though statistically not proven, I am pretty confident that about 50% of Bhutanese eat meat. I feel even more than that. And to make matters interesting, almost all the Bhutanese meat eaters are heavy meat eaters with majority going for beef and pork (rural areas); and chicken, fish and mutton. Don't believe me! visit any mea...
2 comments
Read more

Non-Wood Forest Products (NWFPs) or Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs)

Both Non-Wood Forest Products (NWFPs) and Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) refers to what is earlier known as Minor Forest Products (MFPs). The use of "MFPs" terminology has been discontinued as it seems to greatly mis-guide the produce. For instance collection and trade of Cordyceps ( Ophiocordyceps sinensis ) by high alpine dwellers and even Chirata ( Swertia chirata ) in the east (Shigkhar Lauri) contributes more than 50% of their annual earnings, which of-course is clear that these forest products doesnot justify to be called as minor. NWFPs and NTFPs are two very similar yet different terminologies adopted to address these produce of forest other than timber. In short it includes everything besides timber. Rattan Shoot In Bhutan we use NWFP and it is defined in the National Forest Policy of Bhutan, 2011as, "NWFP means resin, varnish, katha, kutch, plants, flowers, seeds, bamboo, bulbs, roots, leaves, grasses, creepers, reeds, orchids, cane, fungi, moss, medic...
6 comments
Read more

The Mighty Manas River and Future of "SHE"

The Manas River is a trans-boundary river in the Himalayan foothills between southern Bhutan and India . It is named after Manasa , the serpent god in Hindu Mythology . It is the largest river system of Bhutan, among its four major river systems; the other three are Amo Chu or Toorsa , Wang Chu or Raidak, Puna Tsang Chhu or Sunkoosh . The total length of the river is 376 kilometres, flows through Bhutan for 272 kilometres and then through Assam for 104 kilometres before it joins the mighty Brahmaputra River . Mighty Manas River is formed by merging two rivers, viz. Dangme Chhu and Mangde Chhu in a place called Dung-du-me brag and Un-dhala thang in Panbang.  Confluence of Dangme Chhu and Mangede Chhu  and also showing Bird eye-view of Panbang. Source: Google Earth  The river valley has two major reserve forest areas, namely the Royal Manas National Park   in Bhutan and the contiguous Manas Wildlife Sanctuary encompassing Project Tiger Reserve which constitut...
11 comments
Read more