Skip to main content

Bhutan's Mega Farm AKA Slaughter House

I am a vegetarian and I love animals. Unless all Bhutanese go vegan, I am for the establishment of slaughter house for Bhutan has to become meat self sufficient. 

The issue on establishing a mega farm AKA slaughter house is again tabled for discussion in the National Assembly when the opposition questioned the government citing the sentiments of Bhutanese at large. I felt that having understood the economic un-stability of the country by our so called policy makers, such initiatives should not be questioned at-all let alone opposing it. I am for the establishment of mega farm with following reasons:

1. Establishing a mega farm mean meat self sufficient
- Though statistically not proven, I am pretty confident that about 50% of Bhutanese eat meat. I feel even more than that. And to make matters interesting, almost all the Bhutanese meat eaters are heavy meat eaters with majority going for beef and pork (rural areas); and chicken, fish and mutton. Don't believe me! visit any meat shop before 'holiest' month; you shall see it for yourself.  Should Bhutanese meat eaters be supplied meat locally, it shall greatly reduce the outflow of currency and help ease the rupee crunch. Though, i don't have any data on the amount of rupee outflow to supply meat to Bhutanese, I am confident of easing the rupee crunch should the meat be supplied from our own farm.
2. Meat from Bhutan would mean safe
- All animals reared for meat are constantly fed antibiotics to harvest meat at the earliest possible. This means spoiling the purity of meat and ultimately Bhutanese meat eaters land up eating contaminated meat as our regulatory authority does not have  authority to regulate the meat farms across the border. However, should the meat farm AKA mega farm AKA slaughter house be established in the country, our regulatory authority can check the quality of meat being produced and supplied. This shall ensure clean and safe meat to our community of meat eaters.
3. Animals shall be treated better
- I do not claim to have visited any meat farm. Thus, this is based on all the videos with regards to cruelty against meat producing animals i watched in various sites. We can be sure that meat producing animals in Bhutan will not be treated BAD or rather tortured. I am confident of this as we have some of the tough regulatory authorities and it shall be manned by government officials. This also has reference to the powerful statement made by Paul McCartney "If slaughter house had glass walls, everyone would be vegetarian".
4. Meat would come cheaper
- Should meat be supplied within, it would mean meat getting cheaper. I am not an economist but i believe that, quality product at a cheaper rate means an ideal market.
5. We are not hypocrites
If we are against mega farm, all Bhutanese should go vegan; and this is not possible. We are a Buddhist nation at large and we are taught compassion in all grounds. We are also taught that all sentient beings were our parents. However, this does not mean that we should ask someone to kill for us. Buying meat from across the border is no different from asking someone to kill for us for we dread the accumulation of negative merit. If we can't stop eating meat, let's get our own meat. Let us not make someone accumulate negative merit to supply us meat. If we eat, we should kill and that should be our philosophy being a Buddhist.
6. Employment generation
- Having mega farm in the country would also mean generation of employment opportunities. Let's employ as many people as possible and gear towards self sufficiency.

For those who are against the idea of having mega farm established should not defend citing religion. Religion should never be mixed with the policies of the nation. Religion is not to show to the world what we do, but to show to our own self of what we are and how true we are to ourselves. Vegan should not defend from the angle of singular perspective but should try to represent the large.

Having said that, our mega farm should not be established with an objective to supply meat to another country. Should this be the objective, it defeats the whole purpose of self sufficiency as this would mean greed. We should remember that 'self sufficiency' and 'greed' are two totally different words understood as same by many , unfortunately!

Comments

Choki Gyeltshen said…
I support mega farms in Bhutan but I am assuming meat might be expensive.
Unknown said…
uhm! may be you are right Choki Gyeltshen considering the profit margin Bhutanese generally keep. I was talking mainly from the import tax point of view but i am not sure if tax are levied on meats that are imported. Thanks for dropping by. Hope things are fine at your end.

Popular posts from this blog

Cordyceps

  This article is part of my thesis “Fuelwood Consumption and Production in Alpine Bhutan: A case study in Wangchuck Centennial Park, Bumthang, Bhutan). I have also worked on uses of Cordyceps in Pharmaceutical industries long time back, but could not trace out as of now. If people are interested I will try to re-write it and publish it. I have also cited references, in-case if any readers is interested to explore further. I will also try to provide papers to those who are interested to know more about the organism. What is Cordyceps Cordyceps sinensis is an Ascomycetes medical fungus with a long and illustrious history. The genus Cordyceps is mostly entomophagous flask fungi belonging to the family Clavicipataceae (Winkler, 2008). Although it is not actually a mushroom in the taxonomic sense, it has been regarded as a medicinal mushroom for centuries. The name Cordyceps comes from the Latin words “cord” and “ceps”, meaning, “club” and “head”, respectively (Holliday et al., 2005). Th

Non-Wood Forest Products (NWFPs) or Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs)

Both Non-Wood Forest Products (NWFPs) and Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) refers to what is earlier known as Minor Forest Products (MFPs). The use of "MFPs" terminology has been discontinued as it seems to greatly mis-guide the produce. For instance collection and trade of Cordyceps ( Ophiocordyceps sinensis ) by high alpine dwellers and even Chirata ( Swertia chirata ) in the east (Shigkhar Lauri) contributes more than 50% of their annual earnings, which of-course is clear that these forest products doesnot justify to be called as minor. NWFPs and NTFPs are two very similar yet different terminologies adopted to address these produce of forest other than timber. In short it includes everything besides timber. Rattan Shoot In Bhutan we use NWFP and it is defined in the National Forest Policy of Bhutan, 2011as, "NWFP means resin, varnish, katha, kutch, plants, flowers, seeds, bamboo, bulbs, roots, leaves, grasses, creepers, reeds, orchids, cane, fungi, moss, medic

The Mighty Manas River and Future of "SHE"

The Manas River is a trans-boundary river in the Himalayan foothills between southern Bhutan and India . It is named after Manasa , the serpent god in Hindu Mythology . It is the largest river system of Bhutan, among its four major river systems; the other three are Amo Chu or Toorsa , Wang Chu or Raidak, Puna Tsang Chhu or Sunkoosh . The total length of the river is 376 kilometres, flows through Bhutan for 272 kilometres and then through Assam for 104 kilometres before it joins the mighty Brahmaputra River . Mighty Manas River is formed by merging two rivers, viz. Dangme Chhu and Mangde Chhu in a place called Dung-du-me brag and Un-dhala thang in Panbang.  Confluence of Dangme Chhu and Mangede Chhu  and also showing Bird eye-view of Panbang. Source: Google Earth  The river valley has two major reserve forest areas, namely the Royal Manas National Park   in Bhutan and the contiguous Manas Wildlife Sanctuary encompassing Project Tiger Reserve which constitutes a UNESCO Wo